CORRUPTION-------------------- CALAMITIES--------------------- LEND A HAND

Just Look At Where We are Standing>>


RIOTS
:
1946 calcutta 4000 dead, Partition 5,00,00 lives ,Bagalpur 1989 1900 lives ,Hyderabad 1990 2,000 dead ,1984 delhi sikh mascare 4,800 , 1992 Ayodhya 2,350 dead,j&k civil war 35,000 lives sofar, 2002 Guj 2,400 dead.....

TERRORISM
:
To name a few-1993 Bombay(247),1998 Coimbatore (46), '01 J&k assembly (30), '03 mumbai car bombs (52), '05 New delhi (70), '06 MUmbai train Blsts (200), '07 HYD gokul chat (42) 2008-jaipur , banglore, ahmedabad , delhi and MUMBAI 26/11........
>835 people have been killled in terror strikes since 2001

POLITICALCORRUPTION
:
Since 1990 Bofors case, hawala , kerala power scandal, Ketan Pareikh ,Telgi ,Oil for food program( natwar singh), Bhabubai katara (Trafiking) , Jessica lal case , GUjrat Fake Encounter, cash for vote scam......



Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Intelligence-sharing with other countries

Even before 9/11, arrangements for intelligence-sharing on terrorism amongst the agencies of different countries existed. 9/11 brought the realisation that terrorism is an absolute evil whatever be the cause and that unless the intelligence agencies of the world network themselves as effectively as the terrorist organisations, they might not be able to eradicate this menace. This has improved intelligence-sharing.

India's success in bringing Sikh terrorism in Punjab under control before 9/11 might not have been possible but for the valuable intelligence inputs received from agencies of many countries. Some of the significant successes in different countries against Al Qaeda were apparently possible due to increased intelligence-sharing without reservations.

While this is welcome, one has to remember that political considerations peculiar to each country influence their perceptions of terrorism and this is bound to have an effect on intelligence-sharing. Hence, while continuing to benefit from increased intelligence-sharing, the important task of strengthening one's national intelligence collection capability should not be neglected.

Regional cooperation in South Asia

Regional cooperation in the battle against terrorism has not been as successful in south Asia as it has been in the southeast Asian region. This is largely because of Pakistan's policy of using terrorism as a weapon to keep the Indian security forces bleeding and pre-occupied with internal security duties and Bangladesh's tolerance of the activities of terrorists from its territory. Unless these two countries realise the folly of their policies and actions, which have made their own territories playgrounds for terrorist groups of different hues and irrationalities, there is very little scope for any meaningful co-operation.

India has been facing the problem of Pakistani state-sponsored terrorism for over 40 years and nearly 40,000 civilians and 3,500 members of the various security forces have been killed. This has not prevented India from becoming self-sufficient in agriculture, emerging as a major manufacturing country, developing educational, particularly technological, institutions of excellence the like of which no other Asian country can boast of, becoming the leading information technology software power of the region, and building up a foreign exchange reserve of US $72 billion, which, at this rate, should cross the US $100 billion mark in a couple of years.

India can continue to fight Pakistan-sponsored terrorism for another 40 years and yet move forward on its path of development as a major power in the region. Pakistan, on the other hand, has not had the required funds for educational and social development and for the economic advancement of its people because of its obsessive urge to keep India bleeding through terrorism. In its attempt to lift a big boulder and throw it at India, it is dropping it on its own feet.


0 comments: